Promotional price valid on web orders only. Your contract pricing may differ. Interested in signing up for a dedicated account number?
Learn More
Learn More
Streck Diesse CUBE 30 Touch ESR Analyzer
CUBE 30 Touch is an automated instrument for high-volume erythrocyte sedimentation rate testing in EDTA tubes. The internal mixing function automatically prepares up to 30 samples per batch with random access capability to add samples as space allows. No reagents; no exposure to patient sample.
Supplier: Streck 240418
Includes: Internal printer, Internal barcode scanner, User Manual, power cable, plastic adaptor plate for EDTA tubes with conventional stoppers, USB cable, Touchscreen stylus
Description
Convenient
- Produces ESR results directly from EDTA tubes without consuming patient sample
- Compatible with standard 4.0 mL K2EDTA tubes
- Internal mixing function automatically prepares up to 30 samples per batch
- Random access capability to add samples as space allows
- Automatically prints and transmits results to LIS
- Results in 20 minutes
Accurate
- Internal barcode scanner ensures positive patient ID
- Patient and QC data archive
Safe
- No reagents; No biological waste
- No exposure to patient sample
- Utilizes plastic tubes
Service Plan
Extended Warranty available for purchase
Certifications
CE, MET
Compliance
IVD,FDA Class I - Exempt Medical Device,
Warranty and Services
12-month standard warranty included with purchase
Specifications
ESR | |
297 mm | |
390 mm | |
14 kg | |
450 mm | |
internal | |
White, Blue | |
90 per hour | |
ESR | |
User manual, power cable, adaptor plate for EDTA tubes with conventional stopper |
20 min. | |
Whole Blood Collected in K2EDTA | |
1.5 to 4.0 mL | |
50/60 Hz | |
1 | |
CE, MET | |
Automated ESR Analyzer | |
CUBE 30 Touch ESR Analyzer | |
includes 12-month standard warranty | |
U.S. 110-120 Vac; Europe 230 Vac |
Product Content Correction
Your input is important to us. Please complete this form to provide feedback related to the content on this product.
Product Title
Spot an opportunity for improvement?Share a Content Correction